To what extent does advertising construct
our ideas of gender?
This piece of writing will examine
the extent to which advertising constructs our ideas of gender and what
influence the media has had on our opinions and view of gender as well as our
social ideas. The term gender does not always have a known clear definition
which leads to many confusing the term with sex, which can then result in the
misinterpretation of information. Gender is whether a person is masculine,
feminine or androgynous, it relates to their characteristics informed by their
environment, culture and biology. On the other hand, a person’s sex is whether
they are born male or female, purely relating to biological factors. These two
terms are different in a way that an individual may be of a female sexuality
however may take on a more masculine appearance for example, through the
clothes they wear or the style of haircut they have and vice versa. A person’s
gender is unique to each individual and can change over time where as an
individuals sex is fixed from birth. As a person’s gender is not fixed there
are many influences that can result in a person wanting to change their
appearance, one of these influences being advertising. The definition of
advertising is very clear; A notice or announcement in a public medium
promoting a product, service or event. Advertising is used to display and
promote a product to inform the audience as well as persuade them to purchase
the product. This form of media also influenced and continues to influence people’s
opinions and ideas of gender, starting from an early childhood age, as well as
demonstrating the change of the working roles from the 1950s societal roles of
men and women where individuals had very specific job titles, to the change in
the 21st century where there is a less thought of gender specific role. The
effect that advertising has on the formation of how we perceive gender and what
we believe gender to be has a continuous influence on our ideas, as well as
demonstrating the roles that we associate with a particular sex.
A number of authors have considered how
advertising constructs our social ideas as well as our ideas of gender and the
way that ads influence us in our day to day life. John Berger (1972) discusses
the frequency of how we view advertising, describing it as being ‘surrounded by
images of an alternative way of life’ and for a brief moment these images
‘stimulate our imagination either by way of memory or anticipation’. This
demonstrates the scale of advertising and how it is prominent in each
individual life without the population necessarily being aware of the
influences. He also said that ‘publicity proposes to each of us in a consumer
society that we change our lives by buying something more. This ‘more’
publicity persuades us, will make us in some way richer even though we will be
poorer by having spent our money’. This is a key theory of advertising,
highlighting that ads have an influence on an individual’s way of
life/thinking, fulfilling the aim of the advertisers by influencing the
audience to purchase the product. Moreover, Gillian Dyer (1988) discusses the
point that ‘the primary function of advertising is to introduce a wide range of
consumer goods to the public’ and that over a number of years advertising has
become ‘increasingly involved in the manipulation of social values and
attitudes and less concerned with the communication of essential information
about goods and services’. This comment clearly illustrates the growing
influence that graphic design is having on our social ideas. This can also be
applied to a number of different forms of advertising whether it be a style of
cooker that is displayed to attract the more upper class individual, giving the
overall audience a sense that if they purchase this particular product they
will be seen as being a part of the upper-class society or a fragrance brand
aimed at men, leading them to believe that if they purchase and wear the
product women will instantly be attracted to them. The comment made by Dyer
also references to the change in advertising over time, as companies are now
increasingly making the products they are advertising appear more desirable
through the style of imagery used and the focused language to describe the
product. This can change the way an individual views themselves in the culture
they are part of as, for example, they may desire to be more like the models
shown in certain types of advertising, as the models style is seen as a thing
of beauty. Furthermore, Pete Barry (2008) wrote that advertising has the
‘potential to change the way people think enough to sell a product into the millions’.
This brings the two previous comments together, highlighting how advertising
can influence a person’s ideas in a way that they buy the advertised product,
whether it be through desirability or leading a person to believe it will
improve their social status. This refers to the bigger picture of advertising
having an effect on an individual’s thoughts whether it be about the product
they buy, the way they perceive themselves/another individual and the way they
view society, all through the influence of buying a product. These views are
something that is continuously explored through practical investigations and
surveys.
This continuous change in advertising was
investigated by a number of researchers. Research by Bartsch et al (2000)
focused on the sex of the model playing a role in a television advert. This
research highlighted that in 1998, ‘women were twice as likely as men to be in
commercials for domestic products’ whereas in the 21st century, we now see a
change in advertising, where men and women are used more equally across
domestic product advertising, either individually or with a co-actor of the
opposite or same sex. It has been said that many advertisers are
‘unapologetically sexist, and it is presumably used because it is felt that the
message ‘works’ for the target audience, even if it might surprise or offend
others’ David Gauntlett (2008). This has been demonstrated in the Iceland
advert with the slogan originally being “Mums Love It”. From the mid 20’s the advert stared Kerry
Katona, seeing a return of the more traditional Iceland slogan ‘That’s why mums
go to Iceland’. The overall message of this advert is to attract mums to shop
at Iceland through the ease of cooking the food, needing minimal to no
preparation but still providing a satisfactory result, allowing them to
continue with their busy lives as a working mother and not have to worry about
preparing food for their family. Within the advert there is also the subliminal
message that working mums can still maintain a glamorous appearance as Katona
(known at the time as a previous member of Atomic Kitten) is presented in a
natural beauty way, wearing smart casual clothing and minimalist make up,
giving her the attractive mum glow that may have an influence on the audiences
gender appearance (reference to Feature 01). This influence would be through
the desire to more like the person Katona is presented as and is, as she is not
playing a character role but is acting and speaking from what is assumed as
personal experience. Having a model with a positive attitude play the role in
this advert may be an influence to mums who lack the courage with their
appearance as they feel there is limited time for themselves whilst taking care
of the children and fulfilling the family role of the mother. This advert
demonstrates that even though you may be a busy mum you can still take care of
yourself along side the family. However, having a female model dressed in
modern fashionable clothing and only referencing to ‘mums’ could have been seen
as offensive to the opposite side of sex, dads, as they may be the family
member who does the food shopping, which is not an uncommon role for the man of
the family in the 21st century. This is also sending out the message to younger
generations that it is the females job to do the shopping, rather than this
role being shared between family members. On the other hand, it could also be
said that using an attractive female model may be seen as a way to still
attract the male audience without addressing them directly. This could be seen
as a way of attracting the male audience to the shop at Iceland as they may
meet such women. However, it has a been said that ‘men respond positively to
male imagery and women respond positively to female imagery’ (Sheehan 2004).
This would be a controversial comment that many may not agree with. The two
different opinions are key as advertisers will think in the eyes of their
audience when producing an ad. Thinking of their audience opinions is essential
in devising ways to draw the audience into their product/company without the
individual actually knowing it themselves. This has been demonstrated by the
Iceland adverts through the use of subliminal messaging or the imagery and
representation in an advert.
Through the changes of the updating adverts
through product change or a new casting, we have now seen an overall change of
gender roles especially in this subject area of advertising. In particular, the
advertisers of Iceland have decided to take a different approach and use a male
model to attract their audience. This change is essential in keeping up with
cultural changes in society however still using a model that men and women
desire to be like. As the previous advert may have appeared as being sexist,
with the slogan addressing only the feminine gender, the actor was changed to
Peter Andre in 2014,
where the slogan ‘That’s why mums go to Iceland’ being adapted to ‘Thats why
Peter goes to Iceland’. Once again the advertisers chose a seen to be
attractive model to relate to and attract their target audience of men and
women. Andre is presented in a slick fashionable way wearing modern clothing
and having a glowing tan (reference to Feature 02). This again plays on the
idea of the transfer of positivity from the model to the product, in this case
the supermarket. Using a male model moves away from the gender stereotyped role
of the female figure doing the shopping, however still attracting both a male
and female audience through desirability and reliability. Women may desire to
be with a man who maintains such characteristics as Andre and men may relate to
these characteristics, therefore the advert is successfully attracting both a
male and female audience, moving away from gender stereotypes. This again can be an influence of a persons
ideas and views of gender. For example, a young child may watch the advert and
take influence from the model which leads to their ideology of what a man
should look like, taking into account the characteristics demonstrated by the
model. The Gender Scheme Theory by Sandra Bem (1981) explains how individuals
become gendered in society and the influences that maintain and transmit
sex-linked characteristics. In society many may agree that to be at gender
equality a man and women should both be used in this form of advertising
together to demonstrate that this role is equal. Having these models act in the
supermarket advert can change and influence a persons opinions and ideas
whether that be socially or privately. These views may relate to whether they
agree or disagree with the gender stereotype roles or whether they are not
aware with the stereotyping, as it is something that they have always known
therefore do not see the issue of only displaying one gender carrying out a
role, rather than as an equal by displaying two individuals together.
Although the work by Bartsch focused on men and women being viewed separately in advertising with
the sexes rarely being featured together, the change in advertising has seen an
increase in men and women being presented together, whether that be in
photography form or film advertising. One form of advertising that sees men and
women being featured together is underwear ads. The exploration of models has
been seen as an increasing approach to advertising as ‘our culture constantly
undergoes subtle changes’ Soloman &
Ashmore (1992). Male and female models
are continuously used in advertising as it is what attracts the audience to the
product, through reliability and/or desirability, whether they are used in a
active or disengaging way. It was said by Ashmore & Soloman (1992) that
‘the idea is that we, as human beings, find specific facial and body
configurations pleasing to view’. This would relate to why particular
advertisers use models in a way that they are interacting with the product,
such as the Calvin Klein (CK) underwear ads, where the models are wearing only
the underwear product that is being advertised. Calvin Klein has been known for
its extravagant advertising from ‘the term shockvertising’ surfacing ‘with a vengeance
when 15-year-old Brooke Shields was shown lying on her back wearing tight jeans
and murmuring “Nothing comes between me and my Calvins. Nothing”. This caused a
‘public outrage’ and therefore ‘helped ensure the company’s high profile’
Saunders (1998).
Through time CK has worked on their status
using the most popular and desired male and female celebrities at the period of
release, to gain the attention of the audience and to give off the message that
they are providing a premium product that is desired in the fashion industry.
For example, the current release in 2015 features Justin Bieber and Kendall
Jenner individually photographed and with other models. These two young
individuals are idols who many aspire to be like through following them on
social media and in the public eye, leading to the celebrities having a high
popularity rating.
The poster of Kendall Jenner (feature 03)
is displayed in a number of forms, some of which being on the internet and on a
large scale billboard. Jenner is presented in a minimalist way to draw the
audiences attention to the product that is being advertised. Having a
simplistic design also relates to where the design will be displayed. As the
poster will be displayed in a range of sizes, on screen and in print, the
design is versatile in a sense that it will give off the same excellence of
quality no matter what size it is displayed in. Having the model only wearing
the product that is being advertised is a technique that it used by many to
focus the audience’s attention on the product itself, as well as the model
making the product appear desirable. Furthermore, the black background of the
poster against the white of the models skin highlights the desirability of the
female figure as she is displayed as being pure and innocent with no
imperfections. This sense of beauty attracts the audiences to purchase the
product which is the main aim of advertising, no matter how subtle them imagery
is, the audience is always made to want the product. This technique has been
described as being used to ‘transfer positive effect from the model to the
product’ Gulus & Mckeage (2000). Moreover, as these adverts are using such
current desirable male and female models they are giving off the message that
to be more like the beautiful, young models you must purchase the Calvin Klein
underwear, even though in many cases this desired look of beauty is ‘impossible
to attain yet attempts are still made to attain it by purchasing the product’
Sheehan. K (2004). This is the aim of
many fashion advertisements as they play on the strengths of their audiences
culture, drawing them in through the appearance of beauty. If the target audience
of this advertising, which varies from teenagers to middle aged men and women
are influenced by these models, then this may have an affect on their gender
and/or their idea of gender. This
therefore leads to it being said that advertising does have an impact on the
way we view gender and contributes towards our construction of ideas of gender.
Through the exploration of the extent to
which advertising constructs our ideas of gender as well as our social and
cultural attitudes, it is argued that advertising is a contributing factor of
individuals ideas and opinions from an early age. Pete Barry would say that
this effect is used to manipulate the audience to purchase the product. Many may agree with this statement and many
may disagree, each sides can be argued with evidence, however the most likely
solution is that advertising has a large effect on our ideas and opinions. Those
who have investigated and agree with this are Dyer, G (1988), Berger, J (1972),
Gauntlett, D (2008), Sheehan, K (2004). John Berger (1972) described
advertising as being ‘surrounded by images of an alternative way of life’ and
we are being shown the ‘people who have apparently been transformed, and as a
result, enviable’. This demonstrates the scale of advertising and how it is continuously
present throughout our lives without the audience always being consciously
aware of it. This is because we see advertising in a vast number of forms
therefore are not necessarily aware of the impact that it is having on our
opinions and culture, whether that be through the exploration of gender
stereotypes, or not.
As
advertising is present in an individual’s life from a young age it could be
said that it is an influence of a child's gender schema (Bem 1981). The child
would recognize male and female characteristics displayed in the advertising
and associate them with characteristics displayed physically in their life.
This influence would continue throughout their life, frequently having an
affect on their ideas and opinion of gender appearance and social attitudes.
This may lead to a change in their own appearance as well as their beliefs, for
example whether they agree or disagree with gender stereotyping and are aware
of the stereotypes in their culture. This may also be the reason why there is a
confusion between the terms gender and sex. Children are taught that masculine
characteristics are suited to a male figure and vise versa, however gender characteristics
are specific to an individual and can change. The style of advertising is
continuously changing therefore having a frequent change on our ideas and
beliefs however remaining appropriate to the specific cultures of the target
audience. This reinforces what Dyer, G (1988) said about ‘the primary function of
advertising is to introduce a wide range of consumer goods to the public’
therefore must continue to change with culture to ensure that there is always a
relatability factor within the advertising to influence the audience to
purchase the product.
Bibliography
Advertisement
Definition, 17.11.15
[avaliable
from https://drive.google.com/a/students.leeds-art.ac.uk/file/d/0B2scxt7biCRvTnh0aTVoN3BWVUE/view]
John Berger,
Ways of Seeing, Episode 4, 1972, BBC Four
Gauntlett, D.
(2008) Media, Gender and identity. London: Routledge
[avaliable
from https://drive.google.com/a/students.leeds-art.ac.uk/file/d/0B2scxt7biCRvUXNJVlBmajdxQXc/view ]
Iceland
(supermarket) Wikipedia 6.1.16
Sheehan, K
(2004) Controversies in contemporary advertsing. Los Angeles: Sage
Publications. Chaper 7.
Saunders, D.
(1999) Twentieth century advertising. United Kingdom: Carlton Books.
Gender Schema
Theory, Wikipedia, 19.6.15
Barry, P
(2008) The Advertising Concept Book, London: Thames and Hudson, Page 9
[avaliable from https://drive.google.com/a/students.leeds-art.ac.uk/file/d/0B2scxt7biCRvTnh0aTVoN3BWVUE/view ]
The Daily Mail, Mail Online, Why does the fashion industry hate real
women 9.2.16
No comments:
Post a Comment